Profil

Aktuelle Kontaktdaten

Prof. Dr. Spannagel, Christian

Professor für Mathematik und Informatik ; Fak. 3 - Informatik
Icon fuer AdresseAnschrift:
Pädagogische Hochschule Heidelberg
Fakultät III
Institut für Mathematik und Informatik
Im Neuenheimer Feld 561
69120 Heidelberg


Icon Mail spannagel[at]ph-heidelberg.de
vCard erstellen und exportieren

Projekte

Alle202520242018201520142010
Fak. 3 • Informatik
Projekt-ID:485
Dissertation
abgeschlossen

Musikinformatik im Unterricht Entwicklung und Untersuchung einer gendersensiblen Unterrichtseinheit zum Programmieren in der Sekundarstufe I
Projekt-ID:492
Forschungsprojekt
abgeschlossen

Erfassung der Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung von Lehrerinnen und Lehrern zum Einsatz digitaler Medien im Unterricht: Konzeption und Validierung des Instruments SECU

Publikationen

Alle20262025202420232018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003
ArtikelOpen Access · CCPeer ReviewEnglish

Fail, flip, fix, feed: impact on engagement and learning outcomes

Conrardy, R., Spannagel, C. & Stocker, S. R. (2026). Fail, flip, fix, feed: impact on engagement and learning outcomes. Frontiers in Education, 11(1743287).

Noch kein Titelbild vorhanden
ArtikelOpen Access · CCPeer Review

Fail, flip, fix, feed: impact on engagement and learning outcomes

Spannagel, C. (2026). Fail, flip, fix, feed: impact on engagement and learning outcomes. Frontiers in Education, 2026(11), 1-17.

Abstract
Background:

Flipped classrooms and productive failure foster active learning by reversing the traditional sequence of instruction and problem-solving. Despite strong evidence for each approach in secondary mathematics, their combined implementation remains untested.

Aims:

Building on a previous framework (fail, flip, fix, feed), this study evaluates two variants that differ in whether collaboration occurred during problem solving or instruction, assessing their effects on learning and engagement.

Sample:

The sample consisted of 221 students (ages 12–16) from 12 secondary school classes in Switzerland.

Methods:

The study is based on a randomized control group design with two performance and four engagement measurements. Both test batteries are commonly used in productive failure research.

Results:

Learning outcomes were statistically equivalent across both conditions after the first two phases (TOST; equivalence bounds ±0.5 SD). After the full intervention, three-sided equivalence testing yielded inconclusive results, with no reliable performance differences between conditions. Engagement levels did not differ between conditions activities, p = .449. Engagement predicted performance on both posttests, accounting for up to 18% of the variance: β = 0.760, p = .003 on Day 1, and β = 0.860, p = .001 on Day 2. Mental effort showed no reliable effect on performance: βstd. = −0.039, p = .782.

Conclusions:

The findings highlight the need for learning designs that foster student self-reported engagement. However, contrary to the original goals of flipped classroom approaches, the presence and guidance of the teacher did not result in higher student engagement compared to independent study time. The results further suggest that short-term outcomes in 4F-type designs may not be strongly determined by the phase placement of collaboration alone.
Noch kein Titelbild vorhanden