Forschungs- & Publikationsdatenbank PH Heidelberg

Profil

Aktuelle Kontaktdaten

Prof. Dr. Kalz, Marco

Professor für Mediendidaktik; Fak. 2 - Mediendidaktik
Icon fuer AdresseAnschrift:
Prof. Dr. Marco Kalz Professor of Technology-Enhanced Learning/Mediendidaktik Heidelberg University of Education Institute for Arts, Music and Media Im Neuenheimer Feld 561 69120 Heidelberg Germany

Icon Mail kalz[at]ph-heidelberg.de
Icon Homepage https://kalz.cc
OrcID: 0000-0003-1471-5827

vCard erstellen und exportieren

Projekte

Fak. 2 • Mediendidaktik
Projekt-ID:1128 • Ausrichtung: national • 102 020 910 • Zeitraum: 01.04.26 bis 31.03.29
Forschungsprojekt
akt. laufendKooperation

MARSS: Multimodales System zur Abwehr von Desinformation für SchülerInnen
MARSS: A multimodal system to combat disinformation for school pupils
Projekt aufrufen
Projekt-ID:994
Forschungsprojekt
akt. laufend

Interact-Europe 100
Interact-Europe 100
Projekt aufrufen
Projekt-ID:950
Forschungsprojekt
abgeschlossen

Digital Transition and digital resilience in oncology
Digital Transition and digital resilience in oncology
Projekt aufrufen
Projekt-ID:936
Forschungsprojekt
abgeschlossen

Gini2: Intelligente Musiklehre im interaktiven Lernraum mittels Smartphone
Gini2: Intelligent teaching of music mit smart devices in an interactive learning space
Projekt aufrufen
Projekt-ID:890
Forschungsprojekt
abgeschlossen

Innovative collaboration for Inter-specialty cancer training across Europe (INTERACT-EUROPE)
Innovative collaboration for Inter-specialty cancer training across Europe (INTERACT-EUROPE)
Projekt aufrufen
Projekt-ID:799
Entwicklungsvorhaben
abgeschlossen

JOKER – Journalistische und crossmediale Kompetenzentwicklung für Studierende
JOKER: Journalistic and cross-media competence development for students
Projekt aufrufen
Projekt-ID:794
Entwicklungsvorhaben
abgeschlossen

DATA2Teach. Wie Daten Schule und Schulen Daten machen
Data2Teach. How data make schools and schools make data
Projekt aufrufen
Projekt-ID:787
Forschungsprojekt
abgeschlossen

ENTER_EdTech: Entering the EdTech Entrepreneurship World
ENTER_EdTech: Entering the EdTech Entrepreneurship World
Projekt aufrufen
Projekt-ID:580
Forschungsprojekt
abgeschlossen

SOONER - The Structuration of Open and Online Education in the Netherlands
Projekt aufrufen
Prorektorat • für Forschung
Projekt-ID:724
Entwicklungsvorhaben
abgeschlossen

Kooperation Hochschulentwicklung Heidelberg – La Paz (HeiLaP)
Cooperation Heidelberg University Development - La Paz (HeiLaP)
Projekt aufrufen

Publikationen

Alle20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003
SammelbandOpen Access · CCPeer ReviewEnglish

Automated feedback at task level : error analysis or worked out examples – which type is more effective?

Pinkernell, G., Gulden, L. & Kalz, M. (2020). Automated feedback at task level : error analysis or worked out examples – which type is more effective? In: Barzel, B., Bebernik, R., Göbel, L., Pohl, M., Ruchniewicz, H., Schacht, F. & Turm, D. (Hrsg.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Technology in Mathematics Teaching – ICTMT 14 (S. 221-228). Essen: DuEPublico.

Abstract
This paper reports on a small-scale quantitative study conducted in a middle school in Germanythat compared the effects of two types of feedback on reactivating procedural skills with fractions.Tasks and feedback were implemented in a STACK-based digital learning environment that allowedrandomization of numerical and graphical elements of a task as well as automated analysis ofstudent responses to each of the numerical or graphical variations of each task. Due to a small databasis, observations are statistically not verified, but nevertheless point to unexpected results:Especially low achievers seem to benefit more from the error analysis type feedback than fromfeedback that provided fully worked out solutions. If true, this result suggests that for reactivatingand practising skills, error-based feedback is more effective than worked out examples.
PDF
Noch kein Titelbild vorhanden
SammelbandOpen Access · CCPeer ReviewPrintEnglish

The disaggregated, networked and open future of education for sustainable development

Kalz, M., Schophuizen, M. & Türkeli, S. (2020). The disaggregated, networked and open future of education for sustainable development. In: UNESCO (Hrsg.), Humanistic future of learning. Perspectives from UNESCO Chairs and UNITWIN networks (S. 113-116) (1. Auflage). Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

  • Linkunesdoc.unesco.org/in/...
  • ISBN978-92-3-100369-1
  • StichworteEducational objectives, Educational forecasting, Education for sustainable development, Education and culture, open education, networked learning
PDF
Noch kein Titelbild vorhandenDNB
ArtikelOpen Access · CCPeer ReviewPrintEnglish

Does project focus influence challenges and opportunities of open online education? A sub-group analysis of group-concept mapping data

Schophuizen, M., Kreijns, K., Stoyanov, S., Rosas, S. & Kalz, M. (2020). Does project focus influence challenges and opportunities of open online education? A sub-group analysis of group-concept mapping data. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 2020(0), 1-26.

Abstract
Openness in education is not a consistent term or value since “open” is used to describe various things and often means different things to different individu- als. In a research context, it is important to identify the many interpretation(s) and perspectives of openness being investigated, especially since the underlying ideas behind these different interpretations and contexts can yield different results. Not much empirical research on the implementation aspects of open education exists, especially comparing open educational resources (OER) and open online education (OOE). This empirical study addresses this gap, exploring identification and prior- itization of organizational challenges and opportunities of two subgroups of projects (i.e. OER focused or OOE focused) within various higher education institutions in The Netherlands. The main research question in this study is: Does the project char- acter (OER focus vs. OOE focus) of innovation projects lead to perceived differ- ences by actors involved in their implementation? Findings indicate that there are differences in conceptual as well as practical representation between the two groups. These findings imply that higher education institutions need to internally adapt to the needs of various manifestations of “openness” to be able to fully benefit from opportunities and overcome challenges.
PDF
Noch kein Titelbild vorhanden
ArtikelOpen Access · CCPeer ReviewEnglish

Educational innovation projects in Dutch higher education: bottom-up contextual coping to deal with organizational challenges

Schophuizen, M. & Kalz, M. (2020). Educational innovation projects in Dutch higher education: bottom-up contextual coping to deal with organizational challenges. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(36), 1-17.

Abstract
Understanding the process of initiation, design, implementation and embedding of educational innovations in higher education is necessary to develop better strategies for sustainable, large-scale educational innovation. Often early initiated educational innovation projects are not evaluated well enough, making it hard to identify lessons learned. The aim of this study is to investigate how project leaders of innovation projects in Dutch higher education institutions are coping with organizational challenges. To address this we analysed qualitative focus group data with innovators that run projects at Dutch higher education institutions through the lens of contextual coping theory. Results show that the innovators identified challenges (primary appraisal), proposed possible solutions (secondary appraisal) and also were able to take concrete steps (coping efforts) to overcome challenges to design and implement open online educational innovations. From these findings it can be concluded that bottom-up initiatives can create awareness and are capable of finding local resources to establish support for embedding innovations locally, yet, appropriate, synchronized and timely top-down action is needed in order to create a sustainable and institution wide support system for experimentation and embedding of educational innovations. These findings will contribute towards developing better strategies to develop innovative educational practices and quality education.
PDF
Noch kein Titelbild vorhanden
ArtikelOpen Access · CCPeer ReviewEnglish

Elements of Open Education: An Invitation to Future Research.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Conrad, D., Bozkurt, A., Aydin, C., Bendelier, S., Jung, I., Stöter, J., Veletsianos, G., Blaschke, L. M., Bond, M., Broens, A., Bruhn, E., Dolch, C., Kalz, M., Kondakci, Y., Marin, V., Mayrberger, K., Müskens, W., Naidu, S., Qayyum, A., Roberts, J., Sangrà, A., Loglo, F. S., Slagter van Tryon, P. J. & Xiao, J. (2020). Elements of Open Education: An Invitation to Future Research. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(3), 331-334.

Abstract
This paper explores elements of open education within the context of higher education. After an introduction to the origins of open education and its theoretical foundations, the topics of open and distance learning, international education issues in open education, open educational practices and scholarship, open educational resources, MOOCs, prior learning accreditation and recognition, and learner characteristics are considered, following the framework of macro, meso, and micro levels of research in open and distance learning. Implications for future research at the macro, meso, and micro levels are then provided.
PDF
Noch kein Titelbild vorhanden
ArtikelOpen Access · CCPeer ReviewPrintEnglish

Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Technology-Enhanced Learning in Europe

Pammer-Schindler, V., Wild, F., Fominykh, M., Ley, T., Perifanou, M., Soule, M. V., Hernandez-Leo, D., Kalz, M., Klamma, R., Pedro, L., Santos, C., Glahn, C., Economides, A. A., Parmaxi, A., Prasolova-Førland, E., Gillet, D. & Maillet, K. (2020). Interdisciplinary Doctoral Training in Technology-Enhanced Learning in Europe. Frontiers in Education, 150(5), 1-12.

Abstract
Technology enhanced learning (TEL) research connects Learning Sciences, Educational Psychology, and Computer Science, in order to investigate interventions based on digital technologies in education and training settings. In this paper, we argue that doctoral training activity for TEL needs to be situated at the intersection of disciplines in order to facilitate innovation. For this, we first review the state of disciplinarity in TEL, reviewing existing meta-studies of the field. Then, we survey 35 doctoral education programs in Europe in which doctoral students working on TEL topics are enrolled. Findings indicate that most doctoral schools are associated with a single discipline and offer methodological rather than content-specific modules. TEL-specific content is provided only in exceptional cases, creating a potentially isolating gap between master-level education and scientific conferences. On this background, we argue that cross-institutional doctoral training is important to progress TEL as a field. In this article, we study and share the approach of an international doctoral summer school organized by the European society EA-TEL over the past 15 years. The summer school provides foundational methodological knowledge from multiple disciplines, content-specific topical knowledge in TEL, access to cutting edge scientific discourse, and discussion of horizontal issues to doctoral students. We further provide an analysis of shifting program topics over time. Our analysis of both, institutional as well as cross-institutional doctoral training in TEL, constitutes this paper’s core contribution in that it highlights that further integration of perspectives and knowledge is to be done in TEL; together with codification and explication of knowledge in the intersection of disciplines.
PDF
Noch kein Titelbild vorhanden
ArtikelOpen Access · CCPeer ReviewPrintEnglish

Valuing technology-enhanced academic conferences for continuing professional development. A systematic literature review

Spilker, M., Prinsen, F. & Kalz, M. (2020). Valuing technology-enhanced academic conferences for continuing professional development. A systematic literature review. Professional Development in Education, 46(3), 482-499.

Abstract
This review presents a systematic search for and analysis of the state of the art concerning research (1993–2018) on technology-enhanced conferences for academics’ professional development. Fifty-nine scientific publications were included in the review which analyses them through the lens of the value creation framework. Conference formats are undergoing innovations focussed on amplifying social learning, and the role of technologies to enrich this new landscape is being explored. Initial results indicated that while new practices are emerging, a coherent perspective on technology-enhanced continuing professional development to help understand and inform the transition towards learning conferences was lacking across the literature. For instance, traditional evaluations of conferences, such as satisfaction surveys applied by the end of the conference, are not yet taking into account the full range of possible values created through participation in conferences. In addition, results about the use of social media for community building and enduring professional development remain inconclusive, and a more guided approach towards the application of social media at academic conferences is needed. The Value Creation Framework seems to be an appropriate conceptual framework for understanding the impact of conference attendance for the development of (digital) professional competences of academics.
PDF
Noch kein Titelbild vorhanden
ArtikelOpen Access · CCPeer ReviewEnglish

What are the barriers to learners’ satisfaction in MOOCs and what predicts them? The role of age, intention, self-regulation, self-efficacy and motivation

Rabin, E., Henderikx, M., Kalman, Y. M. & Kalz, M. (2020). What are the barriers to learners’ satisfaction in MOOCs and what predicts them? The role of age, intention, self-regulation, self-efficacy and motivation. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 119-131.

Abstract
Massive open online course (MOOC) participants face diverse barriers that prevent them from feeling satisfied with participating in online courses. This study identified those barriers and their predictors. Using pre- and post-questionnaires, MOOC participants reported several characteristics and their barriers to satisfaction during the course. Exploratory factor analysis identified three kinds of barriers. The effects of participants´ age, gender, level of self-efficacy, motivation, self-regulated learning skills and the intention to complete the course were used as predictors of those barriers to satisfaction. The barrier lack of interestingness/relevance was predicted by the self-regulation indices of self-evaluation, study-strategy and help-seeking. The barrier lack of time/bad planning was predicted by the self-regulation indices of goal setting, time management and study strategy and by the age of the respondent. The barrier lack of knowledge/technical problem was predicted by the level of self-efficacy, extrinsic motivation and the self-regulation index of time management, as well as by the behavioural intention to complete the course. Furthermore, an index averaging the extent of the barriers was predicted by the self-regulation indices of goal setting and study strategy, the level of self-efficacy and the level of extrinsic motivation. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed in order to help MOOC participants, instructors and designers to enhance learner satisfaction.
PDF
Noch kein Titelbild vorhanden